Author: Robin Camille Davis

Successful social media in our library + using Bit.ly

We’ve upped our social game this academic year since an inspiring LACUNY talk in September 2013. On our library’s Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, we follow a schedule of Mug Shot Mondays and Throwback Thursdays (#tbt), with other posts peppered in between. #tbt has been super successful on Facebook, in terms of views and clicks, especially since the main college account often re-shares our posts.

Facebook insights screenshot
Facebook insights December 2013 to January 2014 (I took a 3-week break, hence sporadic posts).
Blue bar = clicks on content; pink bar = Likes, comments, and shares

Our posts have been genuine geek-outs (how cool are these old photos!), but they’ve also been diagnostics and test runs. The students don’t know it yet, but we’ll be leveraging the popularity of our weekly posts to promote our upcoming Digital Collections site and next year’s 50th Anniversary Exhibit. What works? What doesn’t work?

We’re realists — we know that our visual posts are probably one “oh, that’s cool” blip in our students’ Facebook feeds. But as optimists, we always include a relevant link (often in a subscription database) and a source link (to our Special Collections pages), with the hope that we’ll serendipitously inspire further research and interest in our unique materials.

A successful #tbt post
A successful Throwback Thursday post

Facebook’s insights page can give us a pretty good idea of whether people are clicking through to the links we provide. If the link goes to a page on our servers, Google Analytics will also record that click-through. But there’s one more way that I like to track the effectiveness of our links.

Using bit.ly to track success of social media posts

Bit.ly admin page
Bit.ly admin page

You can’t see it in the screenshot above, but Colonel Sandusky’s bio from the Facebook photo post got 5 clicks. The shortlink to our Archives page has 42 clicks total, from all of our Archives-related Facebook posts.

Three advantages of Bit.ly:

  • The shortlinks (e.g., bit.ly/jjpexp) look nice in short posts, especially compared to our enormous EZproxy links
  • If you need to include a long link on a poster or slide, a shortlink will make your viewers happy
  • With an account, you can see how often a bit.ly link has been clicked

Three drawbacks to Bit.ly:

  • You can’t export a spreadsheet, to my knowledge, so you’d have to cobble together data if you want a big-picture view. But for a quick peek, it works great
  • You can’t submit a link more than once. So our Archives link has 40+ clicks on 5+ posts
  • If you click on the link yourself, even from the admin view, that adds a click to your stats, giving you a distorted view

Two tips for using Bit.ly:

  • See the pencil next to the short link? That means you can customize the link! As you can see, ours in the above image are jjnewslet, jjdcpeek, jjhamby, and mapcrime. Much more human-friendly than something like 1Xoj5nW. (Please customize your shortlink if you’re putting it on a slide or poster!)
    bitly edit  Yikes! »»»  bitly edited  Much better.
  • Edit the link’s title and/or add a note on your admin view to remind yourself where/why each link is listed. Do this especially if your link has an EZproxy prefix, otherwise every link will be title “Log in with your xxxx username…”
    bitly edited entry

Drawing preliminary conclusions, even our most popular Facebook posts don’t bring in many click-throughs. A little disappointing, but that’s to be expected. People use Facebook when they want to be distracted and scroll quickly through brief diversions, not necessarily when they want to dive deeply into a topic.

Views and clicks are only one measure of success in social media. These numbers are the easiest to track and give the quickest gratification after the effort you put in. But true outreach means increased use and improved perception of the library, which is much harder to quantify at a granular level. (Suggestions?)

I’ll keep updating with other tales and tips for success in social media in our library. Other tips and examples are welcome!

What are emerging tech librarians into this year?

This week, I attended my favorite committee meeting, the LACUNY Emerging Technologies Committee, which I co-chair with Allie Verbovetskaya and Steve Zweibel. We planned out a great semester of workshops and hackathon-style work days by referring to a long list of topics we’ve been compiling. While we wish we could cover everything in a semester, we could only pick a few. But perhaps you’d find it interesting to see this list! What kinds of emerging (or emerged) technologies are librarians into?

Bold italic = we did this last semester.
Bold = we’re doing it this semester.

  • 3D printing
  • Augmented reality: Oculus Rift, Google Glass
  • AutoHotkey
  • Backup best practices
  • Clojure
  • CMS tours: behind the scenes of Drupal, Omeka, &c
  • Collaborative tools (e.g., Google Docs, Editorially)
  • Data structures, normalization
  • Data viz hackathon (ft. Gephi, R, D3)
  • eResource mgmt: SFX, SerialsSolutions
  • Gaming software
  • GIS
  • Google Analytics, beyond SEO
  • HTML & CSS for library web services
  • LaTeX
  • Legacy computing/computers
  • LibGuides API
  • Makerspace tour + happy hour
  • Mapping your library
  • MARCedit
  • Microcomputing: RPi, Arduino, Makey Makey!
  • MySQL / XAMPP
  • Pedagogical design software for teaching critical information literacy skills
  • PHP
  • Preparing to accept digital archival materials
  • Python & MARC
  • Python hackathon (ft. CSVs, regexes)
  • R
  • Raspberry Pi
  • Regular expressions
  • Responsive web design
  • RFID
  • Ruby
  • Semantic Web/Linked Data
  • SPSS
  • Tacit knowledge (e.g., keyboard shortcuts)
  • Twitter bootstrap implementation
  • Usability testing
  • Version control (Git, SVN)
  • Video tutorial creation & editing
  • Web frameworks: Node.Js, Twitter Bootstrap, HTML5 Boiler plate
  • Wikipedia: sponsoring edit-a-thons and/or generating traffic to your library’s resources
  • WorldCat API
  • XML (simple editing)

We also held a popular Demo Day last semester where any CUNY librarian could share a digital project they’ve been working on, big or small, finished or in progress. We’ll be doing that each semester.

What’s missing from this list, readers?

Suggested by Rob Sanderson: linked data

Life With Pi: Microcomputing in Academia

Microcomputing in AcademiaPresentation given December 6, 2013, as part of the CUNY IT Conference held at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

Co-presenters and fellow librarians:
Allie Verbovetskaya
Stephen Zweibel
Junior Tidal

 

Slides (online)
Handout (PDF)


Outline of presentation:

  • Brief introduction to consumer microcomputers and microcontrollers (Allie) — see writeup
  • Microcomputers & pedagogy (Junior)
  • Microcomputers in scholarly research (me)
  • Computational & digital literacy (Stephen)
  • Demonstrations of projects built by presenters
    • LibraryBox: repository available via its own wifi signal (Stephen)
    • OwnCloud: Dropbox-like cloud storage (Allie)
    • Scan a book or enter ISBN, get an auto-citation (Junior)
    • Twitter bot: @mechanicalpoe (me)
    • Light level logger: demo of a 95¢ sensor wired on a breadboard (me)

My part of the presentation follows.

Microcomputers in scholarly research

raspberry pi schematic

Microcomputers come, of course, from computer science research, but they have research applications across just about every discipline — every instance where you might need to do computational work for cheap and don’t mind getting your hands a little dirty setting up these small computers. Scientists, humanists, and artists have all found uses for microcomputers in their work.

A few examples

Applications in the lab & studio

  • Cheap, disposable computing
    • The big draw, of course, is that these are very moderately priced, so cheap that they can be thought of as disposable — and definitely re-purposable. Project pivot? Or something went wrong? No problem — just wipe the computer, reinstall the disk image, and you’ve got a clean slate, no problem.
  • basic sensorsSensors!
    • In my survey of how consumer microcomputers like the Raspberry Pi, Arduino, and BeagleBone are used, many projects used them to log data using sensors. As we’ve seen in the past five years, all kinds of sensors have dropped massively in price, making them easy to integrate into your project. Sensors log data like temperature, humidity, radioactivity, motion, light, sound, GPS, velocity, and so on — any measure of your environment. Many of these sensors can be purchased for $10 or less by now.
  • Clusters!
    • Because they’re cheap to buy and can play nice together, some researchers have hooked microcomputers together to form a cluster or a supercomputer. This means that you can scale your computational power.
  • Prototypes!
    • Small, cheap computers can be used to throw something together that you might then build out with better materials. The Raspberry Pi, for example, is meant to be tinkered with — so you can wire and rewire sensors to a breadboard and write programs to put together a proof of concept before you even think about a soldering iron, and before bringing out the big guns of pricier computers.
  • Integration with other machines!
    • Like any computer, they can be hooked up to power or control other machines, like 3D printers or digital signage or quadrocopters. All of these cool things are now within the reach of both hobbyists and researchers alike.

Advantages

  • Low-cost (stretch that grant!)
    • We all feel the constraints of our budget, whether we’re working within a department that’s had to cut back or we’re trying to stretch out grant money. With some elbow grease, you get a lot of bang for your buck with these low-cost, low-power machines.
  • Tight control over your machines
    • Moreover, because these are simple computers and are designed to be opened up and built on top of, your understanding of your machines can get very deep and technical. With an open source operating system, and using open source software, you can know your machines inside and out. For projects that might involve sensitive data or for which you might otherwise need tight control over, these small, easy-to-handle machines are a good option.
  • Build on code others in the community have contributed
    • On the one hand, having to write or configure your programs at the code-level might be daunting and time-consuming — but the good news is that so much of what has already been done is out there, open and available for you to build on. You might find that someone has already done half the code you need for your research project, and all you have to do is change the variables.
  • Publish & brag
    • These consumer microcomputers are pretty recent, and in my survey, most papers I looked at were published in the last year or two. So it’s a hot topic!

Sample scholarly publication titles

  • Nagy, T., & Gingl, Z. (2013). Low-cost photoplethysmograph solutions using the Raspberry Pi.
  • Petteri, T., Raymond P., N., Hemi, M., Kenneth, K., Dominique, D., Claude, G., & Howard M., C. (n.d). Basic Neuroscience: An inexpensive Arduino-based LED stimulator system for vision research. Journal Of Neuroscience Methods211227-236. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.09.012
  • Kale, N., & Malge, P. (2013). Design and Implementation of Photo Voltaic System: Arduino Approach. International Journal Of Computer Applications76(1-16), 21-26.
  • D’Ausilio, A. (2012). Arduino: A low-cost multipurpose lab equipment. Behavior Research Methods44(2), 305-313. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0163-z
  • ElShafee, A., El Menshawi, M., & Saeed, M. (2013). Integrating Social Network Services with Vehicle Tracking TechnologiesInternational Journal Of Advanced Computer Science & Applications4(6), 124-132.
  • Leeuw, T., Boss, E. S., & Wright, D. L. (2013). In situ Measurements of Phytoplankton Fluorescence Using Low Cost ElectronicsSensors (14248220)13(6), 7872-7883. doi:10.3390/s130607872
  • Awelewa, A., Mbanisi, K., Majekodunmi, S., Odigwe, I., Agbetuyi, A., & Samuel, I. A. (2013). Development of a Prototype Robot Manipulator for Industrial Pick-and-Place OperationsInternational Journal Of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering13(5), 20-28.
  • Alves, N. (2010). Implementing Genetic Algorithms on Arduino Micro-Controllers. [working paper, arXiv]
  • Jha, N., Singh Naruka, G., & Dutt Sharma, H. (2013). Design of Embedded Control System Using Super-Scalar ARM Cortex-A8 for Nano-Positioning Stages in Micro-Manufacturing. Signal & Image Processing: An International Journal4(4), 71-82. doi:10.5121/sipij.2013.4406

Plus you’ll find lots of art installations!  See this great list of installations using Arduino, for example.

P.S.

We put together our presentation using Github as a collaborative writing tool: github.com/szweibel/CUNY-IT-Presentation It was the first time any of us had used Github in this way before. I think it worked well, although there was no built-in way for Github to then display the webpage (had to move our working copy onto another website).

Cross-posted on my personal website

The Murder Mystery Challenge: a pilot project with an impressive turnout

Mystery Challenge

This article was originally published in Lloyd Sealy Library’s biannual newsletter, Classified Information, Fall 2013 (PDF).

Update: In Fall 2014, we updated this game in response to student feedback »

See also: poster presented at CUNY Games Festival in January 2014 »

Each fall, the Library offers multiple venues for first-year students to acquaint themselves with basic college research skills. Librarians visit classes, students attend drop-in workshops, and—this year for the first time—students also participated in the Murder Mystery Challenge.

For two weeks in October (plus a two-day extension due to popular demand), the Library was the site of a puzzle competition. Students looked through historical resources to “solve” a 1921 murder case based on a trial transcript in the Library’s Special Collections that concerned a man shot in midtown. The trial brought forth the testimony of several witnesses and acquaintances of the murderer. From these testimonies, and with input from Prof. Marta Bladek, I put together a five-part puzzle that guided students through using typical Library resources. (You can read through all of the clues + answers in this Murder Mystery Clues Printout PDF [8 MB].) Most of the clues require online research, and one clue requires students to venture into the stacks to find a particular book by its call number. Answers were recorded and timestamped for librarians to assess.

Mystery ChallengeOur desired learning outcomes were basic research skills (finding books and articles) as well as team-based learning and gaining familiarity with the study spaces and friendly staff in the Library.

Teams of four or five first-years were led by trained Peer Mentors from their First-Year Seminar courses. For an hour each day, the Library saw teams arrive in happy groups and scurry to decipher the clues in the narrative we created.

Mystery ChallengeWith the invaluable help of Student Academic Success Programs (SASP), we arranged coveted prizes for the top three teams who answered accurately and most quickly: catered lunches in the Faculty Dining Room, $20 Amazon gift cards, $10 Barnes & Noble gift cards, and New York Times tote bags and travel mugs.

Over 75 first-year students grouped in 19 teams participated in the Challenge. The teams averaged 33 minutes to complete the Challenge, ranging from 11 to 46 minutes.

In a survey sent out after the teams completed the Challenge, students gave us feedback. Each of the 23 students who responded told us two things they learned. All 23 said they learned how to find a book in the library, and 17 also mentioned learning about finding articles or using databases. On a scale of 1 (no fun) to 5 (very fun), students rated the activity at a 3.5.

Mystery ChallengeSelected representative student comments on their experience and suggestions for improving the activity:

  • It’s actually a great way to interact, get competitive and have fun with your peers.
  • Make it more like a murder mystery challenge and less like a way to learn how to use the library.
  • I think it would if been more fun if it wasn’t mostly done online. Also if it was more of a scavenger hunt.
  • Make it more challenging.

Overall, it was a successful pilot project. We’ll tweak and refine the activity, taking into account student input. We hope to stage this event again next fall!

___

You can read through all of the clues + answers in this Murder Mystery Clues Printout PDF (8 MB).